If you would like to read my movie review of Inception – no spoilers – then go here.
As soon as the movie is over you’re left wondering:
The World's Most Indispensable Movie App
Read more about the RunPee app.
- Is Cobb -Leonardo DiCaprio – awake at the end?
- Or was this all a dream?
- Whose dream?
It is brilliant writing to not only leave these and other questions open for interpretation, but to also include support for varying, even contradictory, interpretations. In this analysis, I’m favoring the idea that the entire movie takes place inside of different levels of Cobb’s dream. Although there is an intriguing possibility that we’re in Mal’s dream, throughout the movie.
I have watched the movie three times now. I’ll review some of the key points that I have noticed that warrant further thought.
- We never see Mal (Cobb’s wife) jump. There are two scenes where we see her stand up and move to jump. Each time the scene quickly cuts to Mal falling.
- Cobb walks up to his father-in-law’s (Miles) classroom and looks in through windows in the door. Then cut to Cobb sitting down inside the classroom – without Miles hearing him.
- Miles asks Cobb why he doesn’t design the architecture of the dream himself. Cobb replies, “Mal won’t let me.” At that point Miles leans forward and says, “Come back to reality.”
- There are numerous scenes in the movie where Cobb is supposed to be awake yet everything seems very dreamy. Such as when he squeezes between the buildings in Mombasa as he is running from Kobol security forces.
- The old man who is overseeing the dreaming men says to Cobb, “They come here to be woken up. The dream has become their reality. Who are you to say otherwise?”
The character Ariadne is the architect who is tasked with designing the dream. The terms maze and labyrinth are used repeatedly to describe her role in the story. Writers oftentimes pick the names of their characters to subtly describe their characters. It turns out that the name Ariadne comes from Greek mythology. She is the daughter of the King Minos of Crete. She helped Theseus overcome the Minotaur. If you recall that myth involved a labyrinth as well. Karl Kerenyi observes that her name is merely an epithet and claims that she was originally the “Mistress of the Labyrinth.” ( Wikipedia reference )
The character Yusuf is the dream doctor in the story. This name also has a dreamy reference by way of the Quran: The story – of Yusuf – begins with a dream and ends with its interpretation ( Wikipedia reference ).
If Ariadne and Yusuf are real in the movie, i.e. Cobb is awake, then Christopher Nolan (writer/director) is being hackishly heavy handed in using such a blatant references – which I don’t believe to be the case. But if Cobb is dreaming throughout the movie, then it is Cobb who is writing the story and his subconscious chose the names for these projections from his memory of Greek mythology and Islam.
That argument comes down to this: Christopher Nolan is either writing a story about a man who can share dreams and is trying to get back home, or he is writing a story about a man who is writing the story subconsciously about trying to get back home? If you were a brilliant writer – which Nolan is – which would you choose?
The Inception of Totems
At the very beginning of the movie Cobb is explaining to Saito:
What is the most resilient parasite? Bacteria? Virus? Intestinal worm? An idea. Resilient and highly contagious. Once an idea has taken hold in the brain it’s almost impossible to eradicate. An idea that is fully formed, fully understood, that sticks. [Pointing to his forehead.] Right in there somewhere.
Later, back in reality, while in the helicopter, Saito asks, “Inception. Is it possible?” Arthur says that true inspiration is impossible. But Cobb interrupts and says, “That’s not true. ”
At the very end of the movie when Cobb and Ariadne are in Fischer’s subconscious Cobb gives her the An idea is like a virus speech and adds, “The smallest seed of an idea can grow to define, or even destroy you.”
It’s at that point that we discover that Cobb implanted the idea in Mal that she had to kill herself to wake up to reality. And he feels guilt over that.
However, Cobb also mentions earlier in the movie that the idea for a totem came from Mal. She implanted into him the idea that a physical object could be used to determine if you were awake or dreaming. And we know that the spinning top that Cobb uses was originally Mal’s totem. Cobb picked up her totem in the hotel room before she carried out his inception and jumped. In a sense, they exchanged inceptions right then.
At this point I’m unsure about the effectiveness of the totems. I don’t see how that could actually be used as a concrete test to determine if one is awake or dreaming. Which might be the point: you can’t tell.
And here’s the kicker that Cobb is dreaming throughout the movie: he is the only one who resists waking up from someone’s dream when they awake. At the very end – I’m pretty sure – Cobb and Ariadne are in Fischer’s subconscious, trying to dig him out. But Fischer wakes up when the defibrillator revives him. And Ariadne wakes as well. So how can Cobb remain in Fischer’s subconscious when Fischer is no longer there? I’m either missing something, or that’s one of those unaccounted plot holes or it’s an indication that we’re in Cobb’s dream throughout the movie. I’d wager that it’s not the middle thing.
This generation’s Blade Runner
Blade Runner asked us to question: if we had the memories, and even dreams, of someone, would that makes us that person? (That’s the simplistic version.) As a good friend said immediately after the movie, “Inception is this generation’s Blade Runner.”
The dreams in Inception aren’t your regular dreams. We don’t have the ability to share our dreams. We are alone with our own projections and subconscious. But what if we could share our dreams? How would that be different than reality? For reality is a shared interpretation of what our senses perceive. (Yes, I’m guilty of majoring in philosophy, with an emphasis in epistemology.)
Just like we don’t yet have androids that count electric sheep, we also don’t have the ability to share dreams or enter shared virtual realities. But even now, we can already seriously debate what is real. When, and if, we do have shared virtual realities, these issues won’t be philosophical anymore. They will be practical everyday questions. And how we answer and deal with these questions will reshape everything we know.
Are we in a simulation right now?
If you were a software developer with god-like computing power, you could create a virtual reality that is indistinguishable from reality. If you did so, what would it look like? A universe composed of myriad copies of identical objects – check. We have protons, photons, electrons, etc. Quantized space and time – seems likely. Objects only exist if they are perceived – exactly as Quantum Mechanics dictates.
Yes, if you look at the Universe through the eyes of a software developer, it looks like we are inside a simulation right now. Check out Morgan Freeman’s Through The Wormhole episode 1, Is There a Creator? if you would like to see more about that possibility.
What do you think? What have I missed? Anyone else looking forward to watching this again, and again, and . . . How do you think the sequel will start? With an alarm clock waking up Cobb? 🙂
Don’t miss your favorite movie moments because you have to pee or need a snack. Use the RunPee app (Androidor iPhone) when you go to the movies. We have Peetimes for all wide release films every week, including Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume III, Super Mario Bros. Movie, and coming soon Fast X, and The Little Mermaid 2023. We have literally thousands of Peetimes—from classic movies through today's blockbusters. You can also keep up with movie news and reviews on our blog, or by following us on Twitter @RunPee. If there's a new film out there, we've got your bladder covered.
Creator and developer of the RunPee app. When something doesn’t work right in the app it’s pretty much his fault. 🙂
Aspiring author. Would like to finish his “Zombie Revelations” trilogy if he could break away for working on RunPee and the cottage he’s building for RunPee Mom.
Join the conversation
Very very good read and great interpretation. I agree with you with most points but here is my take of the ending and the entire movie.
I believed at first that Cobb was dreaming throught the whole film yet I came up with a better conclusion. If you notice Cobb always looks and waits for the top to spin during his travels through the levels. Also in I think 2 scenes the top doesn’t completely stop spinning, like in the bathroom when he hits it. Now in the end he spins it and walks away. This makes me conclude that he doesn’t care whether he is in a dream or not only that he is with his kids, which is what he was trying to do since the beginning.
Nolan did what Cobb did to his wife. Nolan implanted an idea in all of our brains with that ending. No matter what someone interperets there is always going to be a counter-argument. I also see that ending as a “kick” back into reality. That it was only a movie and to not think whether it was dream or not but to just be happy Cobb was back with his kids.
Gotta watch this movie like more than once lol but my first view that’s what I got out of it 🙂
I’m not sure if I agree with the first point. Because he could have been with his kids AND wife had he stayed in the dream with her. So he cares if he is dreaming or not.
Very true about the 2nd point. There is no ‘right answer.’ to any of this. It’s one of the most philosophical movies to come out in a very long time.
None of this story is original – okay, I take that back. The way time slows down the deeper into dream levels you go is, as far as I know, original. I’ve seen many versions of this story before. A good one, that few people saw, was The 13th Floor. But Nolan did a great job of taking a very philosophical subject and adding suspense, drama and amazing effects to it.
The fact that there really isn’t a “right answer” is the greatest thing about this movie, and with Nolan I wouldn’t expect it to be otherwise.
Also it’s too bad that people don’t read the movie in this level and blindly love it, maybe that’s the inception that Nolan did.
Great analysis, I’ll surely add some more to it in a few days. Throughout the movie I kept thinking about Blade Runner and I just saw it again. After the second time I watch Inception, I’ll be writing some stuff down.
I’m with you on your analysis. It was in parts brilliant, but, after getting the idea, I found myself rather bored with the implementation (like the snowy scene). I love all the actors but the movie, in my opinion, was rather BLAH other than the cool “idea” of Inception.
Do you think that this Inception ending interpretation is quite probable: http://www.reviewmaze.com/2010/12/inception-ending-interpretation.html
Seems quite strong to me.
The Matrix After 20 Years - A Retrospective: A Different Kind of Hero, a New Kind of Science Fiction -
[…] Analysis of Inception […]