The Batman has a few things to love, and a lot to like. There are hardly any disappointments.
What I loved
My impression is that in all of the Batman movies we’ve seen since Dark Knight we see mostly Bruce Wayne, and Batman fills in the action sequences. Batman is essentially Bruce Wayne’s alter-ego. That’s reversed in The Batman. We see Batman far more than Bruce Wayne, making it feel like Bruce is Batman’s alter-ego. This point doesn’t go unnoticed and is alluded to in the story. This fact alone differentiates this rendition of Batman from others.
The World's Most Indispensable Movie App
Read more about the RunPee app.
The cinematography, by Greig Fraser, was masterful. (Fraser also did: Dune, Rogue One, Vice, Zero Dark Thirty, etc.) Throughout the movie, the cinematography is almost tangible, like a supporting actor. The consistently dark and claustrophobic views permeate nearly every scene. But I never felt that the darkness was forced or overdone. It felt appropriate.
There were a few scenes done with such artistry it made the story secondary to the visual, but in a way that enhanced the story.
The original soundtrack by Michael Giacchino is some of his best work. And that’s saying a lot because Giacchino also did the soundtracks for Rogue One, Star Trek 2009, UP, and Ratatouille. The music compliments the cinematography perfectly.
Any three-hour movie has to be a challenge to edit. First, there are very few movies this long so it’s hard to find any editor with experience working on a film of this scope. Fortunately, they have William Hoy—who edited Watchmen (2:42 runtime). For such a long movie I never felt that the story was dragging on needlessly. Every scene felt appropriate. I know I’m in the minority, but I believe more movies should be this length. All too often I complain about movies that needed to be an extra 20-30 minutes longer to really complete the story. They don’t make that mistake in The Batman. I think it was exactly as long as it needed to be. Sure, scenes could have been cut or tightened to reduce the runtime by thirty minutes, give or take. But at what cost? If there was one scene that felt too long it was the car chase. But I’m not going to complain because it makes such a great Peetime. You can miss the first four minutes of the chase scene and get back in time to see the fantastic ending.
It’s not an exaggeration to say that Robert Pattinson’s portrayal of Batman will be the most analyzed role of the year. Christian Bale set the bar exceedingly high in the Dark Knight trilogy. Ben Affleck’s Batman was universally critiqued as worse than Bale’s portrayal. (Again, a high bar to reach.) Pattinson does better than split the difference between those two. Again, it’s important to remember that they are the same character, but really different roles. We’re not comparing apples to apples here even though the characters are all named Batman.
The other actors all did admirable jobs. Colin Farrell deserves special mention for doing a really fantastic job as The Penguin.
The one other role that deserves a special mention is Paul Dano as Riddler. The comparison, unfair if you ask me, is did Dano do a better job than Heath Ledger as Joker? Again, not a fair comparison for a variety of reasons. First, different characters, but secondly, Dano’s role doesn’t give him anything remotely as meaty to work with. But he did fantastically with what he had.
The writers—Matt Reeves who also directed, and Peter Craig—had the audacity to skip over Batman’s origin story. There’s not a single flashback to young Bruce Wayne. His past is only alluded to. Lt. Gordon has a line, “I’ve known you for two years now and I don’t even know who you are.” That’s about the only concrete clue we get as to when this story takes place in the evolution of Batman.
I expected that the reason for the movie’s nearly three-hour runtime was to account for an origin story plus his present-day adventure. After seeing the movie I’m really happy that they decided to go this route. We already know Batman’s origin. It really doesn’t need another retelling. Kudos to the writers for realizing that and being brave enough to go forward with a story that takes place well into Batman’s career as a vigilante.
The way the character of Riddler is written reminds me of how far we’ve come from the days of comic book villains who were evil for the sake of evil. I’m reminded of Jim Carry’s Riddler that was flamboyant but had no depth. (Remind me in the comments if I’m wrong. It’s been decades since I saw that movie.)
I have a sneaking suspicion that this movie will become more enjoyable with time. I expect that some years from now we’ll look forward to settling in for a marathon of The Batman and the sequels to come. If all the sequels are equal to the original then it will be a marathon worth looking forward to. Of course, there’s the possibility that the sequels will be utter disappointments. This is DC and look what they did with Wonder Woman 1984.
About The Peetimes: We have 4 good Peetimes. I recommend the 2nd Peetime as the best of the bunch. The 3rd Peetime is also very good. It’s all a car chase scene and the best part comes after the end of the Peetime.
There are extra scenes during, or after, the end credits of The Batman. (What we mean by Anything Extra.)
When the Riddler, a sadistic serial killer, begins murdering key political figures in Gotham, Batman is forced to investigate the city’s hidden corruption and question his family’s involvement.
|Rated:||(PG-13) Some Suggestive Material | Drug Content | Strong Disturbing Content | Strong Language | Strong Violent Content|
|Genres:||Action, Crime, Drama|
|Starring:||Zoë Kravitz, Robert Pattinson, Barry Keoghan|
|Writer(s):||Matt Reeves, Peter Craig, Bob Kane|
Don’t miss your favorite movie moments because you have to pee or need a snack. Use the RunPee app (Androidor iPhone) when you go to the movies. We have Peetimes for all wide release films every week, including Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume III, Super Mario Bros. Movie, and coming soon Fast X, and The Little Mermaid 2023. We have literally thousands of Peetimes—from classic movies through today's blockbusters. You can also keep up with movie news and reviews on our blog, or by following us on Twitter @RunPee. If there's a new film out there, we've got your bladder covered.
Creator and developer of the RunPee app. When something doesn’t work right in the app it’s pretty much his fault. 🙂
Aspiring author. Would like to finish his “Zombie Revelations” trilogy if he could break away for working on RunPee and the cottage he’s building for RunPee Mom.
Join the conversation
Holy leg crossing Batman!
A three hour film needs a Bat-room break.
Dan Gardner Administrator
You crack me up!
Jill Florio Administrator
We need a meme of a bathroom door outline of a Batman. You can choose to use male, female, or Batman.
Dan Gardner Administrator
LOL, that would be great.
The Jim Carey Riddler reminds me of a statement, “A villain is a hero that hasn’t had their story told correctly.” He didn’t hit enough dark points to illustrate tragic circumstances of his past. This could be a directorial error or Carey over acting, it’s hard to tell.
Other villians are an embodiment of evil, their wiring diagrams came out wrong and evil is their default modus operandi. Sociopaths illustrate this. I do object to the latest version of Lex Luthor. He was usually written as a hyper rational in control evil doer who did evil things to further his plans. He wasn’t a person who spoke like a squirrel on ritalin. I think that a cold dark controlled portrayal would be much more threatening. A menacing speech delivered with the merest glance in the direction of the intended target would be chilling.
Dan Gardner Administrator
Great points in your comment. I love the quote. That’s spot on. I’ve been working on my own novel/trilogy for the past decade or so and fully recognize that the villain has to be, at least on some level, sympathetic. Having a villain that is evil for the sake of evil is, in my opinion, as lame as the “love at first sight” trope.
I have been told by a counselor, “Two things; with your background it is a miracle that you are not an axe murderer and I would really be afraid if your ability to plan was pointed at my demise!” I understand the dark side…
Dan Gardner Administrator
lol, I’m reminded of that scene in *Finding Nemo*: Happy feeling gone. 🙂
How many movie reboots since 90s era start of Batman, X-Men, Spiderman, Fantastic 4, etc?
I’d like no more than 1 version per decade, but some of these just spit out back to back reboot trilogies (️ ) or just don’t seem to have a plan besides pushing Wolverine and other tired properties.
It’s exhausting, and I don’t want to waste my time or money on yet another throwaway iteration.
I actually stopped Marvel comics after less than a decade, when I noticed too many greedy crossovers and universe reboots in the 90s.
MCU has spoiled me with wanting some actual continuity, and thankfully they are expanding to add characters we haven’t seen a bajillion versions of already across movies and live action tv.
Regardless of the trailers and reviews for the latest Batman, I just couldn’t get excited. Maybe if it had been the Batwoman movie (unfortunately cancelled for terrible financial shell game shenanigans, as if HBO viewers would be at all interested in merging with documentary network ♂️).
After waiting for library DVD, the latest Batman was a decent enough movie, actors, acting, fx, maybe plot, and I should’ve really liked it as a fresh new Batman movie, but I was still left feeling meh ♂️
Why should I care or put effort into figuring out intricate politics plot, if this version is not connected to anything in this over saturated market (could’ve tried making something connected to Gotham tv series) and they’ll probably reboot again in 5-10yrs?
I ended up giving a middle rating.
(for comparison, so far only Morbius got under 5 from me, same weekend library DVD pickup of that snore, which must have been a ponzi shell game to keep hiring those terrible writers, like that Alone In The Dark director).